A Jesuit, a Redemptorist, a Dominican, and cooperation with evil

Flannery, Cooperation with Evil
(2019, CUA Press)

The famous distinction between formal and material cooperation made by St. Alphonsus Ligouri is difficult to sort out with logical precision, especially in its use of intention and act-indifference, for cases outside the paradigmatic ones and approaching the hazy middle ground of “proximate” material cooperation. A recent book by Fr. Kevin Flannery aims to provide more clarity.

The particular point is that an approach that considers circumstances together with proximity is more useful than one that focuses upon act-indifference. More generally, although the formal/material distinction, especially as understood by Alphonsus, serves some purpose as an approximate way of indicating what cooperation is morally acceptable and what cooperation is not, more sustainable theoretically is the Thomistic approach, which obsesses neither about intention nor indifference.

Flannery, Cooperation with Evil, p. 54

That is, St. Alphonsus’s distinction may be a useful confessor’s rule of thumb, but the real fine-tuning of moral analysis requires “Thomistic tools.” Thus far, the book has proved very helpful. More to come, in particular a post (in the works) concerning some current debates about cooperation with evil.

Categories: Current Reading, Moral Philosophy, Moral Theology

Tags: , , , ,

"Sed contra" or "Distinguo" or "Amplius" below ...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: